<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taking Yahoo! forward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:24:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Imran</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-2/#comment-222253</link>
		<dc:creator>Imran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-222253</guid>
		<description>Well i&#039;m not an employee of yahoo but its good to see CEO blogging and the comments are open. Well explained by CEO the economic crunch has really forced every industry to change its game plan similar is the case with internet industry too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well i&#8217;m not an employee of yahoo but its good to see CEO blogging and the comments are open. Well explained by CEO the economic crunch has really forced every industry to change its game plan similar is the case with internet industry too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques Snyman &#124; Website Design</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-2/#comment-207422</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques Snyman &#124; Website Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-207422</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m busy doing research for an article I&#039;m writing on search engines, and coming across this post from 2006 is very interesting, seeing that we&#039;re sitting in 2009, which gives a nice 3 year retrospective on this post. Time travel, the internet way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m busy doing research for an article I&#8217;m writing on search engines, and coming across this post from 2006 is very interesting, seeing that we&#8217;re sitting in 2009, which gives a nice 3 year retrospective on this post. Time travel, the internet way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mycado</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-2/#comment-155580</link>
		<dc:creator>Mycado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-155580</guid>
		<description>Very interesting !

Thank you a lot :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting !</p>
<p>Thank you a lot :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-2/#comment-140752</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-140752</guid>
		<description>let&#039;s sue yahoo and its advertisers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>let&#8217;s sue yahoo and its advertisers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dasven</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-2/#comment-137907</link>
		<dc:creator>dasven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-137907</guid>
		<description>Get real and stay real and avoid being yet another hiccup of objectivelesness :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get real and stay real and avoid being yet another hiccup of objectivelesness :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Abilla</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-2/#comment-112691</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Abilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-112691</guid>
		<description>Best of luck in making Yahoo! more nimble.  I know many engineers and product folks read my blog, the content of which is primarily on Lean Manufacturing, Agile for Software, and Six Sigma.  Best of luck -- I can see Yahoo! becoming quicker and more responsive to the customer&#039;s needs already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best of luck in making Yahoo! more nimble.  I know many engineers and product folks read my blog, the content of which is primarily on Lean Manufacturing, Agile for Software, and Six Sigma.  Best of luck &#8212; I can see Yahoo! becoming quicker and more responsive to the customer&#8217;s needs already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiutopor</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-2/#comment-79484</link>
		<dc:creator>hiutopor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-79484</guid>
		<description>Hi all! 
 
Very interesting information! Thanks! 
 
G&#039;night</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all! </p>
<p>Very interesting information! Thanks! </p>
<p>G&#8217;night</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-2/#comment-57573</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-57573</guid>
		<description>I have just severed all premium accounts due to incompetence and account siphoning at Yahoo.  I don&#039;t have a lot of attaboys for you like all the ass kissers above; but I am so dissappointed in your involvement (ever) with Yahoo that I am finished with Yahoo as an end user and stock inverstor...forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just severed all premium accounts due to incompetence and account siphoning at Yahoo.  I don&#8217;t have a lot of attaboys for you like all the ass kissers above; but I am so dissappointed in your involvement (ever) with Yahoo that I am finished with Yahoo as an end user and stock inverstor&#8230;forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-2/#comment-39226</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-39226</guid>
		<description>Yahoo is the worst sales and customer service organization in the biz!  I don&#039;t know what changes you made in the last couple of years by yahoo has went down hill quickly.  I am selling now!!!  Your customer service is the absoulute worst. Your employees refuse to give any info out about there own supervisors let alone the executives.  Whey was the last time any of your exec. talk to a customer?  Based on what I have experienced I would say a couple of years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo is the worst sales and customer service organization in the biz!  I don&#8217;t know what changes you made in the last couple of years by yahoo has went down hill quickly.  I am selling now!!!  Your customer service is the absoulute worst. Your employees refuse to give any info out about there own supervisors let alone the executives.  Whey was the last time any of your exec. talk to a customer?  Based on what I have experienced I would say a couple of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Белая Церковь</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-2/#comment-33125</link>
		<dc:creator>Белая Церковь</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-33125</guid>
		<description>However i would love to see Yahoo come out things which i can keep at my desk or stick to my laptop and these things should react based on my activities online or offline at Y!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However i would love to see Yahoo come out things which i can keep at my desk or stick to my laptop and these things should react based on my activities online or offline at Y!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emma</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-2/#comment-31911</link>
		<dc:creator>emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-31911</guid>
		<description>I really hate Yahoo because of the lack of communication between them and publishers/advertisers. I hope that what Terry is saying holds water and that they bridge the gap soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hate Yahoo because of the lack of communication between them and publishers/advertisers. I hope that what Terry is saying holds water and that they bridge the gap soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bips</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-22744</link>
		<dc:creator>Bips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-22744</guid>
		<description>Yahoo certainly has the width which Google is missing. The biggest problem which I see right now is to monetize a huge chunk of junk traffic which Yahoo faces. 33% of Yahoo&#039;s traffic is from Mail, why cant we monetize it?
Moreover Google is also bridgning the gap with Yahoo in terms of traffic. Very soon Google will not be just a search engine but also a social and networking platform. Yahoo has the first mover advantage and it should reap it.
Monetize whatever you have without making customers hate you and Yahoo can be number one in couple of years. I do have some ideas of monetizing the mail and yahoo homepage and I hope to share it with the Yahoo team soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo certainly has the width which Google is missing. The biggest problem which I see right now is to monetize a huge chunk of junk traffic which Yahoo faces. 33% of Yahoo&#8217;s traffic is from Mail, why cant we monetize it?<br />
Moreover Google is also bridgning the gap with Yahoo in terms of traffic. Very soon Google will not be just a search engine but also a social and networking platform. Yahoo has the first mover advantage and it should reap it.<br />
Monetize whatever you have without making customers hate you and Yahoo can be number one in couple of years. I do have some ideas of monetizing the mail and yahoo homepage and I hope to share it with the Yahoo team soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hector</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-15818</link>
		<dc:creator>hector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-15818</guid>
		<description>When you have an old computer, you know online privacy is limited or nonexistent but i am sad coz i cant use many new y! products. :-(

Anyway getting online is still worth the trouble, coz i can sit here and let my mind travel. (http://www.flickr.com/photos/freshelectrons/360809345/) :-)

Yahoo! i have all the space to store data, offline/online. I have so many resources/technology but i just dont have the time. :-(

We will see the creation and evolution of Online Personal Web Bots. 
Right away i can think of two, one at my site and another which explores.
My OPWB will automatically:
- check on sites, blogs, bookmarks etc.,
- Download or bookmark sites/files based on tags, words, file formats i approve or decide.
- OPWB will work while i am offline analyzing blog comments, news etc., Well it could even respond on my behalf ;-)
- It will redirect data among gadgets, services or tools based on priority, people or situation. Ex: computer Email convert to mobile sms or mobile call convert to computer video conference.
- My OPWB will help me decide if i should check on a particular information. Ex: If i should read a blog post at all or if i should be informed about a particular news. 
It will help me read, understand, analyze and research information  better online. It will help me write, express, create better content online.
There is so much more to share but i just remembered American Idol, i mean if i cant sing and i keep singing, it can be funny and i really dont want to be funny. 

However i would love to see Yahoo come out things which i can keep at my desk or stick to my laptop and these things should react based on my activities online or offline at Y!. 

This is deja vu, i had written about &#039;search landscape&#039; in my thinkpad, few days back. Anyway, you could add on to the World Explorer a search landscape feature using y! directory. A landscape where search results like sites or blogs are colour coded and categories, sub categories have shapes like cones, dome etc., 
Selected results are presented in the frame where you have photos. 
-By default, the landscape is based on the most searched keyword. 
-Users can create art on these landscape when at maximum zoom or can embed art on the colourfull landscape with the keyword used.


Yahoo!, i cant do much if i cant brainstorm with you all and i just cant keep being funny. Thank you for letting me post here, i wish Yahoo! the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you have an old computer, you know online privacy is limited or nonexistent but i am sad coz i cant use many new y! products. :-(</p>
<p>Anyway getting online is still worth the trouble, coz i can sit here and let my mind travel. (<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/freshelectrons/360809345/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/freshelectrons/360809345/</a>) :-)</p>
<p>Yahoo! i have all the space to store data, offline/online. I have so many resources/technology but i just dont have the time. :-(</p>
<p>We will see the creation and evolution of Online Personal Web Bots.<br />
Right away i can think of two, one at my site and another which explores.<br />
My OPWB will automatically:<br />
- check on sites, blogs, bookmarks etc.,<br />
- Download or bookmark sites/files based on tags, words, file formats i approve or decide.<br />
- OPWB will work while i am offline analyzing blog comments, news etc., Well it could even respond on my behalf ;-)<br />
- It will redirect data among gadgets, services or tools based on priority, people or situation. Ex: computer Email convert to mobile sms or mobile call convert to computer video conference.<br />
- My OPWB will help me decide if i should check on a particular information. Ex: If i should read a blog post at all or if i should be informed about a particular news.<br />
It will help me read, understand, analyze and research information  better online. It will help me write, express, create better content online.<br />
There is so much more to share but i just remembered American Idol, i mean if i cant sing and i keep singing, it can be funny and i really dont want to be funny. </p>
<p>However i would love to see Yahoo come out things which i can keep at my desk or stick to my laptop and these things should react based on my activities online or offline at Y!. </p>
<p>This is deja vu, i had written about &#8217;search landscape&#8217; in my thinkpad, few days back. Anyway, you could add on to the World Explorer a search landscape feature using y! directory. A landscape where search results like sites or blogs are colour coded and categories, sub categories have shapes like cones, dome etc.,<br />
Selected results are presented in the frame where you have photos.<br />
-By default, the landscape is based on the most searched keyword.<br />
-Users can create art on these landscape when at maximum zoom or can embed art on the colourfull landscape with the keyword used.</p>
<p>Yahoo!, i cant do much if i cant brainstorm with you all and i just cant keep being funny. Thank you for letting me post here, i wish Yahoo! the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hector</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-12901</link>
		<dc:creator>hector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-12901</guid>
		<description>Internet is a networked world, so what should Global User&#039;s expect and do?  

P.S.
Why do you ask for my mail id, is it to search for my post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internet is a networked world, so what should Global User&#8217;s expect and do?  </p>
<p>P.S.<br />
Why do you ask for my mail id, is it to search for my post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hector</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-11964</link>
		<dc:creator>hector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 06:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-11964</guid>
		<description>-No matter what you give or how good the environment is within the company. Teams will want conquests (for money n fame), direct this energy outwards. 

-Society &amp; Education system: think of products &amp; resources for the present and future generation. Ex: calculator &amp; spellcheck

-Travel problems &amp; global offices: Maybe some team members can work the other locations timezone with less work hours. Ex: one team member from X country and another team member from Y country working on the same project work in each other timezone from their respective location with less/flexi hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-No matter what you give or how good the environment is within the company. Teams will want conquests (for money n fame), direct this energy outwards. </p>
<p>-Society &amp; Education system: think of products &amp; resources for the present and future generation. Ex: calculator &amp; spellcheck</p>
<p>-Travel problems &amp; global offices: Maybe some team members can work the other locations timezone with less work hours. Ex: one team member from X country and another team member from Y country working on the same project work in each other timezone from their respective location with less/flexi hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-11637</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-11637</guid>
		<description>I am disappointed at the 40% fall in Yahoo&#039;s share price last year and hope decision making improves. Most notable issues in 2006: MySpace/ YouTube were missed, Panama was delayed, and further ground has been ceded to Google. In the most dynamic sector in the world mistakes like this simply cannot be made; management must be more on the ball; restructures are no panacea or substitute for making courageous and bold moves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am disappointed at the 40% fall in Yahoo&#8217;s share price last year and hope decision making improves. Most notable issues in 2006: MySpace/ YouTube were missed, Panama was delayed, and further ground has been ceded to Google. In the most dynamic sector in the world mistakes like this simply cannot be made; management must be more on the ball; restructures are no panacea or substitute for making courageous and bold moves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cathy</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-11299</link>
		<dc:creator>cathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-11299</guid>
		<description>Surfing is like choreographed dancing. Web links are like ugly steps by themself but when its choreographed well, the final act becomes a graceful dance between the web surfer and content provider. 
Have you checked the ask or aol search? Everyone is trying something new! I love Yahoo!, it has heart.

-Nowdays everywhere around the globe, Quality has taken a backseat. Everyone now just wants to top the base quality rating, so if a company sets it at 40%, another company unlike in the past would not work for 90% but would want to just get maybe 42% quality rating.
-Before their where many legends now its the age of zillion stars. Its the age of &#039;give it all, be it all, time up, move on&#039;! 
-Unfortunetly its the game engine concept with content and products, new games are made using existing engine.

365 days ahead, Y! happy 2007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surfing is like choreographed dancing. Web links are like ugly steps by themself but when its choreographed well, the final act becomes a graceful dance between the web surfer and content provider.<br />
Have you checked the ask or aol search? Everyone is trying something new! I love Yahoo!, it has heart.</p>
<p>-Nowdays everywhere around the globe, Quality has taken a backseat. Everyone now just wants to top the base quality rating, so if a company sets it at 40%, another company unlike in the past would not work for 90% but would want to just get maybe 42% quality rating.<br />
-Before their where many legends now its the age of zillion stars. Its the age of &#8216;give it all, be it all, time up, move on&#8217;!<br />
-Unfortunetly its the game engine concept with content and products, new games are made using existing engine.</p>
<p>365 days ahead, Y! happy 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SATISH A DORA</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-10608</link>
		<dc:creator>SATISH A DORA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-10608</guid>
		<description>MARY CHRISTMAS HAPPY CHRISTMAS

MAY WISH YOU A HAPPY NEW YEAR  2007


A To Z YAHOO THE BEST</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MARY CHRISTMAS HAPPY CHRISTMAS</p>
<p>MAY WISH YOU A HAPPY NEW YEAR  2007</p>
<p>A To Z YAHOO THE BEST</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SATISH A DORA</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-10607</link>
		<dc:creator>SATISH A DORA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-10607</guid>
		<description>MARY CHRISTMAS HAPPY CHRISTMAS

MAY WISH YOU A HAPPY NEW YEAR  2007

Not In Past Or In Future Service Provider Like You

LONG LIVE YAHOO &amp; STAFF LONG LIVE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MARY CHRISTMAS HAPPY CHRISTMAS</p>
<p>MAY WISH YOU A HAPPY NEW YEAR  2007</p>
<p>Not In Past Or In Future Service Provider Like You</p>
<p>LONG LIVE YAHOO &amp; STAFF LONG LIVE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-9889</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 01:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-9889</guid>
		<description>Sal? Sal? Anything on TV tonight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sal? Sal? Anything on TV tonight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liasi</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-8298</link>
		<dc:creator>liasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-8298</guid>
		<description>-It is your y! brand the public and your employees see. Evolve to have the public love it, bussiness want it and employees respect it!
-Dont lay all your eggs when its time for breakfast! 
-Every cool site from every other industry is a case study!
-Coding challenges, basic problem!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-It is your y! brand the public and your employees see. Evolve to have the public love it, bussiness want it and employees respect it!<br />
-Dont lay all your eggs when its time for breakfast!<br />
-Every cool site from every other industry is a case study!<br />
-Coding challenges, basic problem!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Artman</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-8040</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Artman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-8040</guid>
		<description>Mr. Semel,

You talk about positive change--but have you even bothered to read the comments to Sal Taylor Kidd&#039;s 11/28 &quot;Anecdotal&quot; on changes to the TV pages?  There are over 200 comments there, virtually all HUGELY negative.  (And I suspect the balance are internal shills.)  A popular product was ruined through over-engineering and &quot;make-work&quot; changes.  Maybe there was some thought that the &quot;old&quot; TV listings weren&#039;t enough of a profit center, but gradual introduction of revenue streams would have been a far better course than an entire re-do which your users have totally rejected by flocking to competitors who offer clean, straightforward listings without endless delay through needless separation of information into distinct web pages and forced &quot;signon&quot; requirements.

You may be seeing that &quot;hits&quot; are going up, but if so, it&#039;s only because information that used to be on one page has been fractured into many pages--you&#039;re losing users big time.  If there&#039;s ever been a worse example of a boss destroying a good product with a replacement just to justify a huge headcount, I&#039;ve never seen or heard of it.  This isn&#039;t peanut butter, this is feces in a jar trying to sell itself on the shelf.

Eric Artman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Semel,</p>
<p>You talk about positive change&#8211;but have you even bothered to read the comments to Sal Taylor Kidd&#8217;s 11/28 &#8220;Anecdotal&#8221; on changes to the TV pages?  There are over 200 comments there, virtually all HUGELY negative.  (And I suspect the balance are internal shills.)  A popular product was ruined through over-engineering and &#8220;make-work&#8221; changes.  Maybe there was some thought that the &#8220;old&#8221; TV listings weren&#8217;t enough of a profit center, but gradual introduction of revenue streams would have been a far better course than an entire re-do which your users have totally rejected by flocking to competitors who offer clean, straightforward listings without endless delay through needless separation of information into distinct web pages and forced &#8220;signon&#8221; requirements.</p>
<p>You may be seeing that &#8220;hits&#8221; are going up, but if so, it&#8217;s only because information that used to be on one page has been fractured into many pages&#8211;you&#8217;re losing users big time.  If there&#8217;s ever been a worse example of a boss destroying a good product with a replacement just to justify a huge headcount, I&#8217;ve never seen or heard of it.  This isn&#8217;t peanut butter, this is feces in a jar trying to sell itself on the shelf.</p>
<p>Eric Artman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Reo-Dero</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-7262</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Reo-Dero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-7262</guid>
		<description>Being in the driver&#039;s seat in an organization like Yahoo! is, no doubt, demanding and requires vision and the ability to draw strategies that will maintain that the business stays on course. Lately, Yahoo! has been very inventive, and we can see that management had to remodel some strategies, old and not so old strategies, and use them to hit the targets. Audience, Advertisers and Technology are all being fed in Yahoo! at the moment, but, as you may agree Terry, some of this progress remains Beta, and we are still to see the real effects of the &#039;re-org&#039; in time. I have to say though, from where I stand, everything looks promising, with one exception, Co-Branding Yahoo! itself. 

I am a big fan of strategic alliances, but I have to admit, co-branding has always been risky business as far as I am concerned. As you would know, partnerships and alliances can be made to fade away or made discreet much easier than hiding a &#039;Brand Name&#039;, (if things go wrong--you&#039;re guilty by association). Yahoo! appears to have merged, I emphasise the words &#039;ONLY APPEARS&#039; to have merged, with some media organizations where both now share the same web space, and live on Yahoo! servers, but also merged their brand names and place that so prodominantly on the headers and advertising pages and so on.

How well will that work..?? Although I&#039;d like to take everything you said beyond doubt, this particular point has to wait before it gets my assessment. I do hope that in one or two years time, we will be able to say: This was a great move.

NOTE: Media, all over the world, is also the subject of re-org. Organizations are being sold and bought, re-structured and are, forver, the focus of rules, regulations and legislation makers. Therefore, tagging along with a media organization can prove exhausing and can force partners to follow only the directions that suit the media organization itself.

Carlos Reo-Dero
AdsenseProject.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being in the driver&#8217;s seat in an organization like Yahoo! is, no doubt, demanding and requires vision and the ability to draw strategies that will maintain that the business stays on course. Lately, Yahoo! has been very inventive, and we can see that management had to remodel some strategies, old and not so old strategies, and use them to hit the targets. Audience, Advertisers and Technology are all being fed in Yahoo! at the moment, but, as you may agree Terry, some of this progress remains Beta, and we are still to see the real effects of the &#8216;re-org&#8217; in time. I have to say though, from where I stand, everything looks promising, with one exception, Co-Branding Yahoo! itself. </p>
<p>I am a big fan of strategic alliances, but I have to admit, co-branding has always been risky business as far as I am concerned. As you would know, partnerships and alliances can be made to fade away or made discreet much easier than hiding a &#8216;Brand Name&#8217;, (if things go wrong&#8211;you&#8217;re guilty by association). Yahoo! appears to have merged, I emphasise the words &#8216;ONLY APPEARS&#8217; to have merged, with some media organizations where both now share the same web space, and live on Yahoo! servers, but also merged their brand names and place that so prodominantly on the headers and advertising pages and so on.</p>
<p>How well will that work..?? Although I&#8217;d like to take everything you said beyond doubt, this particular point has to wait before it gets my assessment. I do hope that in one or two years time, we will be able to say: This was a great move.</p>
<p>NOTE: Media, all over the world, is also the subject of re-org. Organizations are being sold and bought, re-structured and are, forver, the focus of rules, regulations and legislation makers. Therefore, tagging along with a media organization can prove exhausing and can force partners to follow only the directions that suit the media organization itself.</p>
<p>Carlos Reo-Dero<br />
AdsenseProject.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bharathi</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-7237</link>
		<dc:creator>Bharathi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 12:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-7237</guid>
		<description>I read peanut butter memo. Within few days this re-org was done. Naturally I thought it was due to peanut butter! 

I admire Yahoo for many years. I hold YHOO. But, I can&#039;t happily say &quot;Yahoo!&quot; because you guys are losing ground. I hope that all your new initiatives work out well. BTW, new email beta rocks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read peanut butter memo. Within few days this re-org was done. Naturally I thought it was due to peanut butter! </p>
<p>I admire Yahoo for many years. I hold YHOO. But, I can&#8217;t happily say &#8220;Yahoo!&#8221; because you guys are losing ground. I hope that all your new initiatives work out well. BTW, new email beta rocks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-7172</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 01:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-7172</guid>
		<description>The open forum here is commendable....
I have 5 &#039;pillars&#039; for YHOO success over GOOG, MySpace and any competition.....simply coorespond to my address and we will share!
Yahoo Fanatic from day one....
Can you Yahoo???
GLY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The open forum here is commendable&#8230;.<br />
I have 5 &#8216;pillars&#8217; for YHOO success over GOOG, MySpace and any competition&#8230;..simply coorespond to my address and we will share!<br />
Yahoo Fanatic from day one&#8230;.<br />
Can you Yahoo???<br />
GLY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H. Deans</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-7141</link>
		<dc:creator>David H. Deans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 21:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-7141</guid>
		<description>Mr. Semel, with all due respect to your announcement, IMHO you still need to broaden your company&#039;s perspective of who your customers and partners include.

Those of us who have generously invested our &#039;user generated content&#039; may not show up on Yahoo&#039;s balance sheet, but I believe that we are a key untapped asset that you can utilize -- as you evolve your company&#039;s business model to the next level.

My point: don&#039;t under-value the collaborative communities that are already within your grasp. We are here to help you, but you really must align us with credible marketing leadership.

I have written a brief commentary on this very topic at my &#039;Digital Lifescapes&#039; blog -- http://dhdeans.blogspot.com -- by all means, have someone from your team contact me if you want to discuss my perspective.

Respectfully,

David H. Deans</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Semel, with all due respect to your announcement, IMHO you still need to broaden your company&#8217;s perspective of who your customers and partners include.</p>
<p>Those of us who have generously invested our &#8216;user generated content&#8217; may not show up on Yahoo&#8217;s balance sheet, but I believe that we are a key untapped asset that you can utilize &#8212; as you evolve your company&#8217;s business model to the next level.</p>
<p>My point: don&#8217;t under-value the collaborative communities that are already within your grasp. We are here to help you, but you really must align us with credible marketing leadership.</p>
<p>I have written a brief commentary on this very topic at my &#8216;Digital Lifescapes&#8217; blog &#8212; <a href="http://dhdeans.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://dhdeans.blogspot.com</a> &#8212; by all means, have someone from your team contact me if you want to discuss my perspective.</p>
<p>Respectfully,</p>
<p>David H. Deans</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahesh R S</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-7131</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahesh R S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-7131</guid>
		<description>I found it extremely weird that Yahoo should go through what I had predicted some time back and blogged about on Oct 10, 2006 (way before the original Peanut Butter Manifesto).

I would appreciate if you read through my new and original post (at the bottom of the new post). Excuse me if I am harsh in my post, but, as someone whose web experience was guided by you (Yahoo), it hurts to see my friend and guide (you, Yahoo!) going down for no apparent reason other than bad management (I feel/believe).

I don&#039;t know if your COO is to be blamed or if he was just a scapegoat. Whatever that be, I am hoping you would know and would take care of things.

Anyway, the sooner Yahoo recovers and the sooner it gets back to the top position, the earlier I will be happy. And trust me, I will happily rewrite (on my blog) about &quot;The rebirth of Yahoo!&quot; I am hoping you will give me that chance.

(My post about Yahoo&#039;s state-of-affairs is at http://srmiocc.blogspot.com/2006/11/rewriting-yahoos-obituary.html)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found it extremely weird that Yahoo should go through what I had predicted some time back and blogged about on Oct 10, 2006 (way before the original Peanut Butter Manifesto).</p>
<p>I would appreciate if you read through my new and original post (at the bottom of the new post). Excuse me if I am harsh in my post, but, as someone whose web experience was guided by you (Yahoo), it hurts to see my friend and guide (you, Yahoo!) going down for no apparent reason other than bad management (I feel/believe).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if your COO is to be blamed or if he was just a scapegoat. Whatever that be, I am hoping you would know and would take care of things.</p>
<p>Anyway, the sooner Yahoo recovers and the sooner it gets back to the top position, the earlier I will be happy. And trust me, I will happily rewrite (on my blog) about &#8220;The rebirth of Yahoo!&#8221; I am hoping you will give me that chance.</p>
<p>(My post about Yahoo&#8217;s state-of-affairs is at <a href="http://srmiocc.blogspot.com/2006/11/rewriting-yahoos-obituary.html)" rel="nofollow">http://srmiocc.blogspot.com/2006/11/rewriting-yahoos-obituary.html)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David G.</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-7124</link>
		<dc:creator>David G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-7124</guid>
		<description>Terry, This change at the top may be good for the administrative end of the organization but by all means the technical end needs very much work. Being online everyday we see such a draw a your system the closer we get to Christmas. The slow down is so great. Many of my e-mail friends say the same if your on YAHOO there are always problems and now it seems like were near a system crash as Walmart&#039;s site had on or around Black Friday. Media has stated that shopping on the internet is MAJOR but how can the system handle it if you don&#039;t upgrade to handle it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry, This change at the top may be good for the administrative end of the organization but by all means the technical end needs very much work. Being online everyday we see such a draw a your system the closer we get to Christmas. The slow down is so great. Many of my e-mail friends say the same if your on YAHOO there are always problems and now it seems like were near a system crash as Walmart&#8217;s site had on or around Black Friday. Media has stated that shopping on the internet is MAJOR but how can the system handle it if you don&#8217;t upgrade to handle it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-7112</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-7112</guid>
		<description>I, too, applaud Mr. Semel for his post and openness.   However, it has been clear that he is not the right guy for the job from day one and the numbers indicate he may be the worst CEO in the history of the world.  Under his watch, Yahoo allowed a competitor whose biggest and most important partner was Yahoo to grow from somewhere in the millions of market value to $150 billion.  Sure it&#039;s nice that Yahoo&#039;s value has gone up by around $20 billion (but at a much slower pace than the overall growth rate of online advertising), but when you realize that they gave up $150 billion in value to Google, you can see that is a historic transfer of value from one company to another. 

This latest announcement harkens back to Mr. Semel&#039;s original strategy proclamation in 2001 where the centerpiece was moving revenues from 90% advertising to only 50% advertising and 50% subscription.   I think this following excerpt from a Wired News story dated November 15, 2001 gives a great example of how Mr. Semel changed Yahoo&#039;s culture from Silicon Valley wunderkind to tired old media overnight and demonstrates a &quot;stark contrast&quot; from Google&#039;s Valley-style approach:

In stark contrast to Yahoo&#039;s early days as a startup founded by two young graduate students, maturity is apparently also in. Greg Coleman, Yahoo&#039;s executive vice president who is actively involved in building more marketing and advertising partnerships said, &quot;You can&#039;t do it with youth and enthusiasm.&quot; 

Coleman said that the company had recently hired 30 new ad sales people, who were for the most part 40- or 50- something and had years of experience and established contacts with the major ad agencies. 

&quot;It makes you sleep well at night,&quot; he said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, applaud Mr. Semel for his post and openness.   However, it has been clear that he is not the right guy for the job from day one and the numbers indicate he may be the worst CEO in the history of the world.  Under his watch, Yahoo allowed a competitor whose biggest and most important partner was Yahoo to grow from somewhere in the millions of market value to $150 billion.  Sure it&#8217;s nice that Yahoo&#8217;s value has gone up by around $20 billion (but at a much slower pace than the overall growth rate of online advertising), but when you realize that they gave up $150 billion in value to Google, you can see that is a historic transfer of value from one company to another. </p>
<p>This latest announcement harkens back to Mr. Semel&#8217;s original strategy proclamation in 2001 where the centerpiece was moving revenues from 90% advertising to only 50% advertising and 50% subscription.   I think this following excerpt from a Wired News story dated November 15, 2001 gives a great example of how Mr. Semel changed Yahoo&#8217;s culture from Silicon Valley wunderkind to tired old media overnight and demonstrates a &#8220;stark contrast&#8221; from Google&#8217;s Valley-style approach:</p>
<p>In stark contrast to Yahoo&#8217;s early days as a startup founded by two young graduate students, maturity is apparently also in. Greg Coleman, Yahoo&#8217;s executive vice president who is actively involved in building more marketing and advertising partnerships said, &#8220;You can&#8217;t do it with youth and enthusiasm.&#8221; </p>
<p>Coleman said that the company had recently hired 30 new ad sales people, who were for the most part 40- or 50- something and had years of experience and established contacts with the major ad agencies. </p>
<p>&#8220;It makes you sleep well at night,&#8221; he said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://ycorpblog.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-7109</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodel.yahoo.com/2006/12/05/taking-yahoo-forward/#comment-7109</guid>
		<description>I really hate Yahoo because of the lack of communication between them and publishers/advertisers.  I hope that what Terry is saying holds water and that they bridge the gap soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hate Yahoo because of the lack of communication between them and publishers/advertisers.  I hope that what Terry is saying holds water and that they bridge the gap soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.733 seconds -->
